The space agencies are actively engaged in studying the physiological adaptation to space
environment through studies on board the International Space Station (ISS) but also on the
ground. Ground-based experiments simulating the effects of weightlessness are used to better
understand the mechanisms of physiological adaptation, design and validate the
countermeasures. Dry immersion (DI) is a ground-based model of prolonged conditions of
simulated microgravity, which has been mainly used in Russia. The past years however, the
model has been implemented as well in Europe and expertise in conducting DI studies has been
gained in particular in France where a few DI studies have been conducted in the MEDES Space
Clinic in Toulouse for CNES (French Space Agency). Dry immersion involves immersing the
subject in water covered with an elastic waterproof fabric. As a result, the immersed
subject, who is freely suspended in the water mass, remains dry. Within a relatively short
duration, the model can faithfully reproduce most physiological effects of actual
microgravity, including centralization of body fluids, support unloading, and hypokinesia.
Furthermore, physiological changes have been reported in the neuromuscular, skeletal and
sensorimotor systems, in fluid electrolyte regulation, in the cardiovascular system,
metabolism, blood and immunity, respiration, and thermoregulation. Dry immersion provides a
unique opportunity to study the physiological effects of the lack of a supporting structure
for the body (a phenomenon called 'supportlessness'). As such, dry immersion is proposed to
mimic actual spaceflight in terms of the monotonous environment, posture-motion limitations,
hemodynamic changes and hypokinetic effects, support unloading, and decreased proprioceptive
input. Immersion studies have so far only been conducted in men and a minority of studies
using the bedrest model have included women. Likewise, few studies conducted to date have
investigated gender differences in the astronaut population. The small number of female
astronauts may be part of the reason why scientific data are lacking to draw valid
conclusions about possible gender differences. However, if women currently constitute only
about 10% of astronauts, women are and will be more and more represented in crews. Women now
constitute 30% of American crews and NASA (US space agency) has announced gender parity for
crews on future lunar missions. It is therefore essential to study the physiological changes
induced by weightlessness in women, to compare them with those observed in men and to develop
efficient countermeasures for preventing them. The main physiological systems will be
explored before, during and after the 5 days of immersion through a battery of specific
standardized tests and measurements. The objective of the study is to evaluate the
physiological changes induced by 5 days of dry immersion in the female organism. The study
conditions such as patient recruitment, nutrition, data collection, data management,
reporting for adverse events are standardized. The results will be analyzed by scientists
specializing in each field in order to better understand the dry immersion model, to compare
its effects with those of the bedrest model and those of spaceflight. The clinical (adverse
effects, comfort of subjects) and operational aspects are also part of the secondary
objectives of the study.
Twenty healthy female subjects will participate in the study. There is no published data on
dry immersion with female participation to help calculation the sample size. Moreover, female
spaceflight and bedrest data are scarce, and do not provide any insight into inter-individual
variability. This prolonged DI protocol in women is conceived as a pilot, descriptive,
explorative study, as well as an operational and methodological study. Power-based
calculation of the number of subjects is not directly applicable for such explorative
studies. However, based on effect sizes obtained with previous DI studies in men, a total of
20 subjects was deemed necessary for this study.
How understandable was the trial content above?
Hard to understand
Easy to understand